Those of you who have read my recent post know that I have spent a good deal of time looking into the work of two of our great pioneers Royal Rife and Hulda Clark. I’ve developed some insights into each that I would like to share with you to help you interpret their research. I’d also like to know what you think about them.
I think it is important to understand where a person is coming from in order to really understand their ideas. There is an old saying, “To the person who only has a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.” This means that your past experience shapes your perspective of problems. If the only way you know to fix things is by beating on them you will try that approach with everything.
Rife and Clark have a lot in common. They were both free thinkers who were not afraid to think outside the box or challenge the conventional wisdom of their day. They were willing to follow any good idea anywhere it led them. They both spent a lot of time researching electricity and frequencies and the effects on the body but they were very different in other ways.
Royal Rife
Royal Rife (1888-1971) seems to have been a technician at heart working in the medical field. He was looking for technical solutions to medical problems. His first invention was a powerful optical microscope. His various Rife systems were all technical devices created to attack medical problems. Rife doesn’t seem to have been very concerned with finding the root causes of disease. He was much more concerned with finding ways to kill them. Rife seems to have been a little more money motivated but perhaps that was due more to his investors and sponsors that it was to him. He went to great pains to disguise his technology to protect the profit potential. Much of his work was lost to posterity because of his desire to keep things secret. Of course, it didn’t help that his lab was broken into on several occasions and his research stolen or destroyed. He also seemed more concerned with his social standing. He seems a lot like the Wright Brothers in his mind set.
Hulda Clark
Hulda Clark (1928-2009)on the other hand was a classically trained medical researcher with a PhD in physiology. She seems to have come at things from an organic perspective. She was concerned with finding the root cause(s) of disease to inform her approach to curing the disease and to prevent them in the first place. She focused a large part of her energy on prevention. Although she also had a technical side to her as evidenced by the fact that she was a ham radio operator, she leaned much more heavily on organic solutions than she did on technical fixes. She seemed more concerned with advancing knowledge and helping people that she was with financial gain. She even published her designs for her Zapper and her Syncronometer and encouraged people to build their own.
I’m not saying that either was better or worse than the other, just that they were very different. Both were very interesting. Can you imagine having Rife, Clark and Tesla at a fantasy dinner party? Talk about some interesting conversations. What do you think? Did I miss anything important about these two great pioneers?
[Note: We are not medical doctors. We do not diagnose medical illnesses or prescribe any medical treatment. Please consult your doctor before starting any course of therapy.]