Where Do the Frequencies Come From?
Have you ever wondered where the Rife frequencies we use today came from? To me the biggest problem we have today in using Rife technology is that we do not have the same degree of precision and certainty that Rife had in determining which frequencies we need to run.
Royal Rife’s Approach
Royal Rife had a very scientific approach to determining the exact frequency that would kill any specific type of pathogen. He determined what he called the Mortal Oscillatory Rate or MOR frequencies of pathogens by observing the bacteria or virus he was targeting through a very powerful microscope. When he found the correct frequency, he could watch the microorganism self-destruct. He knew for a certainty which frequency killed which microorganism because he watched it happen. We don’t know how many microorganisms Rife found MOR frequencies for in his lifetime, one report was that he identified 54. Unfortunately, his lab was broken into several times and finally raided by the FDA. As a result most of his research was lost or stolen. Today we only have records of 18 frequencies that Rife found.
Common Annotated Frequency List (CAFL)
Most of the MORs that have been documented since Royal Rife were discovered by a much more subjective trial and error process. People who had a particular illness would run different frequencies and try to identify which one(s) seemed to have the most effect on their disease. They would document these frequencies and share them with others who had the same disease to see if they would help them. This is a pretty hit or miss process that is subject to a lot of false positives. You might get better or get a Herx response to a frequency but that just means it killed some microorganism in your body but not necessarily the one you were hoping for. If you feel better after running a particular frequency several times, it might mean that you killed the pathogen you were shooting for or it might mean you killed something else and that made you feel better. The results of all this group experimentation were combined with results from Rife and others into what is called the Common Annotated Frequency List (CAFL)
Even with all of these limitations, the CALF list is the best free resource we have for MOR frequencies. From what I can tell the frequencies that are pre-programmed into many modern Rife machine auto channels or folders appear to have come from the CALF list. You can research and download the CALF list as well as other similar list at electroherbalism.com.
Modern Scientific Research
There have been a few modern researchers with the scientific and technical skills to be more precise such as Dr. Hulda Clark. However, Dr. Clark was experimenting using microscope slides with dead pathogens. Are the natural resonate frequencies of dead organisms the same as the live version? Probably but nobody know for sure? Most of the frequencies Dr. Clark identified are 100 kilohertz or higher. This means that DR. Clark’s frequencies far exceed the frequency range of many modern Rife machines so they are not usable for most Rife experimenters. To get around this, some experimenters will try to scale Dr. Clark’s frequency down to a frequency their machine can generate and hope that the higher harmonics will reach her frequency with sufficient power to get the job done. They do this by dividing Dr. Clark’s frequency a) by 2 until until get a frequency their machine can handle or b) by “e” (a mathematical constant = 2.718281828459) raised to a power that is a multiple of 3 (3,6,9)( which is known as a scalier harmonic) until they get a frequency that their system can generate.
Doug MacLean who invented the Doug Coil machine actually duplicated much of Dr. Rife’s process even though he was unaware of Dr. Rife’s work at the time. He acquired a very high powered microscope and used it to find frequencies to kill his Lyme disease using a magnetic coil. I did a Google search to try to find a list of Doug’s frequencies online but I didn’t have any luck. If anyone has a URL for his frequency list please email me the link.
DNA linked to MOR
In the late 1990’s a researcher named Charlene Boehm developed a mathematical formula to calculate MOR frequencies based on the length of the DNA molecule of a microorganism. She published a condensed version of the thesis in 1999. You can read it at the URL below. When you compare her calculated results to the experimental results from Royal Rife there is a very close correlation which indicates that her formula works. The beauty of her method is that it is precise and it isn’t based on people reporting how they felt. DNA researchers have cataloged the length of the DNA molecules for just about everything on the planet so the formula can be used on organisms where experimentally determined frequencies don’t exist. I would have no qualms about using her frequencies. The only problem is that she charges for them and requires you to sign a non-disclosure agreement not to pass on the information.
If you are willing to pay for Rife frequencies you can find out how to order them on her website.
I am cheap so I elected to go with the free CALF list. The software I am using to run my machine has a built-in database of the CALF frequencies so it is simple for me to use them. However, if I ever had anything really serious going on I’d probably buy the precise frequencies from Charlene. While the CAFL list may contain a number of false positives the odds are pretty good that the real MORs are in there somewhere, so running everything on the list gives you good odds of killing what you are after.
[Note: We are not medical doctors. We do not diagnose medical illnesses or prescribe any medical treatment. Please consult your doctor before starting any course of therapy.]
[…] The final blow came when the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) raided the lab and seized all of the equipment and research. As a result of all the destruction to his lab equipment and notes, much of his research has been lost. We only have a record of 18 of the MOR frequencies he discovered although he has been reported to have documented at least 54. The vast majority of frequencies in use today were obtained by other methods see Where Do Rife Frequencies Come From? […]